Looking for validity or testing it? The perils of stepwise regression, extreme-scores analysis, heteroscedasticity, and measurement error
- 1 February 2011
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Personality and Individual Differences
- Vol. 50 (3), 409-415
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.09.014
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Emotional Intelligence: On Definitions, Neuroscience, and MarshmallowsIndustrial and Organizational Psychology, 2010
- AEIM: A new measure and method of scoring abilities-based emotional intelligencePersonality and Individual Differences, 2010
- The Science of Emotional IntelligenceEuropean Psychologist, 2008
- Is there a validity increment for tests of emotional intelligence in explaining the variance of performance criteria?Intelligence, 2006
- Stepwise Regression and Stepwise Discriminant Analysis Need Not Apply here: A Guidelines EditorialEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1995
- Assessing the importance of an independent variable in multiple regression: Is stepwise unwise?Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1988
- Analysis of multiplicative combination rules when the causal variables are measured with error.Psychological Bulletin, 1983
- A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for HeteroskedasticityEconometrica, 1980
- Incremental Validity : a RecommendationEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1963
- Some ruminations on the validation of clinical procedures.Canadian Journal of Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie, 1959