Spinal-Fusion Surgery — The Case for Restraint
Top Cited Papers
- 12 February 2004
- journal article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 350 (7), 722-726
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmsb031771
Abstract
The use of spinal-fusion surgery is increasing rapidly in the United States. Most of these expensive, complex procedures are now being done for back pain and degenerative disease. Spinal fusions require long operations and are associated with an increase in the rate of complications, particularly in older patients. The benefits of surgery may be only modest, and pain relief is affected by many factors besides the anatomy. The authors of this article argue for restraint in the use of spinal-fusion surgery and for controlled trials to define more clearly the associated benefits and the indications.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Spinal-Fusion Surgery — Advances and ConcernsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Critical Analysis of Trends in Fusion for Degenerative Disc Disease Over the Past 20 YearsSpine, 2004
- Use of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 to Achieve Posterolateral Lumbar Spine Fusion in HumansSpine, 2002
- Outcomes of Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion in Utah Patients Receiving Workers’ CompensationSpine, 2001
- 1997 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical StudiesSpine, 1997
- 1997 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical StudiesSpine, 1997
- Visual Loss as a Complication of Spine SurgerySpine, 1997
- Lumbar Laminectomy Alone or With Instrumented or Noninstrumented Arthrodesis in Degenerative Lumbar Spinal StenosisSpine, 1997
- Epidemiology IntroductionSpine, 1995
- The Use of Primary Internal Fixation in SpondylolisthesisSpine, 1993