Compared optical performances of multifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses (contrast sensitivity and dynamic visual acuity)
Open Access
- 1 April 1994
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by BMJ in British Journal of Ophthalmology
- Vol. 78 (4), 249-251
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.78.4.249
Abstract
The functional results (contrast sensitivity and dynamic visual acuity) of 19 multifocal (3M design) and 14 all polymethylmethacrylate biconvex monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs), 6 mm in optical diameter were compared. Best corrected visual acuity was > or = 8/10 (Monoyer chart) Parinaud 2 in all cases. Major differences of functional performance in favour of monofocal IOLs were found outside standard conditions of vision (low contrast and illumination levels). A significant difference in contrast sensitivity was found for each spatial frequency in favour of multifocal IOLs (0.0016 < p < 0.05). Mesopic vision was statistically higher in the monofocal IOL group (p = 0.0015). Moreover, dynamic visual acuity allowed accurate evaluation of the difference in performance between these two models of implant. In view of these results multifocal IOLs should be reserved for patients with normal psychosensitive adaptation; an ocular pathology that could alter contrast sensitivity or mesopic vision is a contraindication for multifocal IOLs.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Food and Drug Administration study update. One-year results from 671 patients with the 3M multifocal intraocular lens.1993
- [Comparative study of 2 types of bifocal implants by measurement of visual acuity and contrast sensitivity].1991
- [A good vision in spite of a multifocal implant?].1990
- Contrast sensitivity in patients with a new type of multifocal intraocular lensJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 1990
- Low-Contrast Letter Charts as a Test of Visual FunctionOphthalmology, 1983