Variability of metabolite yield using STEAM or PRESS sequences in vivo at 3.0 T, illustrated with myo‐inositol

Abstract

Using as an example the myo‐inositol (mI) band at ∼3.6 ppm in the proton spectrum from brain, an evaluation is presented that highlights the difficulties of quantifying metabolites with strongly coupled spins with either STEAM or PRESS and demonstrates some advantages of prospective sequence analysis when measuring their concentrations. The analysis emphasizes the variation in coupled‐spin signal yield and lineshape, compared with that of uncoupled singlets such as N‐acetylaspartate, a variation that differs from one metabolite spin system to another. This difference in variation between a target metabolite (e.g., mI) and its contaminating background metabolites (e.g., glutamate and taurine, etc.) is shown to provide in certain circumstances a substantial reduction in background contamination (both metabolite and macromolecule) while maintaining sufficient signal‐to‐noise ratio for precise quantification. For example, sequence times are demonstrated, both for STEAM and for PRESS, that, relative to the short echo‐time sequences typical in the literature, enhance the signal to metabolite background of the 3.6‐ppm band of mI by factors of 1.7 and 1.3, respectively, essentially eliminate the macromolecular baseline, and yet in vivo retain an S/N ∼ 10 in both cases. Magn Reson Med 53:760–769, 2005.