Short‐and Long‐Term Reproducibility of QT, QTc, and QT Dispersion Measurement in Healthy Subjects
- 1 May 1994
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
- Vol. 17 (5), 928-937
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1994.tb01435.x
Abstract
The study investigated interobserver and intrasubject reproducibility of QT interval duration and dispersion measured in standard 12-lead ECGs recorded at 25 mm/sec. Twenty-eight healthy volunteers were studied. Each undenvent four ECG recordings, which were performed 1, 7, and 30 days apart. Two independent observers analyzed each ECG record. In each lead with a distinguishable T wave pattern, the RR interval, Q-peak of T interval, and Q-end of T interval were measured using a digitizing board with a 0.1-mm resolution. From each recording the following measures were derived: the maximum, minimum, and mean QT interval; maximum, minimum, and mean heart rate corrected QT interval (QTc); QT and QTc dispersion (the difference between the maximum and minimum QT interval among the 12 leads); and adjusted QT and QTc dispersion (dispersion divided by the square root of the number of leads measured). The interobserver and short-term (1 day) and long-term (1 week and 1 month) reproducibility of individual indices was assessed by computing the relative errors and comparing them by a standard sign test. In addition, the distributions of maximum and minimum QTc values among electrocardiographicleads, and the differences between QT-end and QT-peak based measurements were investigated. The results showed that: (1) the measurement of the QT interval from standard ECG recordings is feasible and not operator dependent (interobserver relative error <4%); (2) the duration of the QT interval in healthy volunteers is stable and its short- and long-term reproducibility is high (intrasubject relative error < 6%); (3) parameters that characterize dispersion of the QT interval in the 12-lead ECG are highly nonreproducible, both between subsequent recording (relative error of 25%–35%) and between observers (relative errar 28%–33%), the reproducibility of QT dispersion is significantly lower than that of QT duration (P < 0.01); and (4) the duration of the entire QT interval correlates only weakly with the duration of the Q-peak of T interval.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Precordial QT interval dispersion as a marker of torsade de pointes. Disparate effects of class Ia antiarrhythmic drugs and amiodarone.Circulation, 1992
- Ionic Mechanisms Determining the Timing of Ventricular Repolarization: Significance for Cardiac ArrhythmiasAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1992
- Dispersion of ventricular repolarization in the long QT syndromeThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1991
- QT dispersion: an indication of arrhythmia risk in patients with long QT intervals.Heart, 1990
- Importance of lead selection in QT interval measurementThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1988
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986
- Prognostic importance of QTc interval at discharge after acute myocardial infarction: A multicenter study of 865 patientsAmerican Heart Journal, 1984
- Long QT: Good, bad or indifferent?Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 1984
- QT interval prolongation as predictor of sudden death in patients with myocardial infarction.Circulation, 1978
- The Measurement of the Q-T Interval of the ElectrocardiogramCirculation, 1952