Appendectomy versus Antibiotic Treatment in Acute Appendicitis. A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
Top Cited Papers
- 27 April 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in World Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 30 (6), 1033-7
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-0304-6
Abstract
Background: Appendectomy has been the treatment for acute appendicitis for over 120 years. Antibiotic treatment has occasionally been used in small uncontrolled studies, instead of operation, but this alternative has never before been tried in a multicenter randomized trial.Patients and Methods: Male patients, 18–50 years of age, admitted to six different hospitals in Sweden between 1996 and 1999 were enrolled in the study. No women were enrolled by decision of the local ethics committee. If appendectomy was planned, patients were asked to participate, and those who agreed were randomized either to surgery or to antibiotic therapy. Patients randomized to surgery were operated on with open surgery or laparoscopically. Those randomized to antibiotic therapy were treated intravenously for 2 days, followed by oral treatment for 10 days. If symptoms did not resolve within 24 hours, an appendectomy was performed. Participants were monitored at the end of 1 week, 6 weeks, and 1 year.Results: During the study period 252 men participated, 124 in the surgery group and 128 in the antibiotic group. The frequency of appendicitis was 97% in the surgery group and 5% had a perforated appendix. The complication rate was 14% in the surgery group. In the antibiotic group 86% improved without surgery; 18 patients were operated on within 24 hours, and the diagnosis of acute appendicitis was confirmed in all but one patient, and he was suffering from terminal ileitis. There were seven patients (5%) with a perforated appendix in this group. The rate of recurrence of symptoms of appendicitis among the 111 patients treated with antibiotics was 14% during the 1‐year follow‐up.Conclusions: Acute nonperforated appendicitis can be treated successfully with antibiotics. However, there is a risk of recurrence in cases of acute appendicitis, and this risk should be compared with the risk of complications after appendectomy.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Why Does the Clinical Diagnosis Fail in Suspected Appendicitis?The European Journal of Surgery, 2000
- Reducing negative appendectomy: evaluation of ultrasonography and computer tomography in acute appendicitisInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2000
- Diagnostic Accuracy in 2,351 Patients Undergoing Appendicectomy for Suspected Acute Appendicitis: A Retrospective Study 1986–1993Digestive Surgery, 1999
- The accuracy of C-reactive protein in diagnosing acute appendicitis—a meta-analysisScandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation, 1997
- Ultrasonographic Findings after Conservative Treatment of Acute Appendicitis and Open AppendicectomyActa Radiologica, 1995
- Ultrasonographic Findings After Conservative Treatment of Acute Appendicitis and Open AppendicectomyActa Radiologica, 1995
- Randomized controlled trial of appendicectomy versus antibiotic therapy for acute appendicitisBritish Journal of Surgery, 1995
- Indications for operation in suspected appendicitis and incidence of perforationBMJ, 1994
- The Diagnostic Value of Repetitive Preoperative Analyses of C-Reactive Protein and Total Leucocyte Count in Patients with Suspected Acute AppendicitisScandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 1994
- Contemporary management of the appendiceal massBritish Journal of Surgery, 1993