The Study of Species in the Era of Biodiversity: A Tale of Stupidity
Open Access
- 21 January 2010
- Vol. 2 (1), 115-126
- https://doi.org/10.3390/d2010115
Abstract
Research policies ensuing from the Convention on Biological Diversity made huge funds available to study biodiversity. These were mostly dedicated to projects aimed at providing services to taxonomy via information and technology, or to develop “modern”, i.e., molecular, approaches to taxonomy. Traditional taxonomy was overly neglected and is in serious distress all over the world. It is argued that both novel and traditional ways to study biodiversity are essential and that the demise of traditional taxonomy (based on phenotypes) in the era of biodiversity is the result of an unwise policy, mainly fostered by portions of the scientific community that aim at taking total advantage of the funds dedicated to the study of biodiversity.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Recent innovations in marine biologyMarine Ecology, 2009
- Zoology in the era of biodiversityItalian Journal of Zoology, 2009
- Bilaterian Phylogeny: A Broad Sampling of 13 Nuclear Genes Provides a New Lophotrochozoa Phylogeny and Supports a Paraphyletic Basal AcoelomorphaMolecular Biology and Evolution, 2009
- Toward a Modern Revival of Darwin's Theory of Evolutionary NoveltyPhilosophy of Science, 2008
- Predicting unknown species numbers using discovery curvesProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2007
- DNA barcoding is no substitute for taxonomyNature, 2005
- DNA Taxonomy—the Riddle of Oxychloë (Juncaceae)Systematic Botany, 2005
- The promise of a DNA taxonomyPhilosophical Transactions Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2004
- Variability of species' roles in marine communities: change of paradigms for conservation prioritiesMarine Biology, 2002
- The prevalent distrust of scienceNature, 1995