Intensive Care for Extreme Prematurity — Moving beyond Gestational Age
Top Cited Papers
- 17 April 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 358 (16), 1672-1681
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa073059
Abstract
Decisions regarding whether to administer intensive care to extremely premature infants are often based on gestational age alone. However, other factors also affect the prognosis for these patients. We prospectively studied a cohort of 4446 infants born at 22 to 25 weeks' gestation (determined on the basis of the best obstetrical estimate) in the Neonatal Research Network of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development to relate risk factors assessable at or before birth to the likelihood of survival, survival without profound neurodevelopmental impairment, and survival without neurodevelopmental impairment at a corrected age of 18 to 22 months. Among study infants, 3702 (83%) received intensive care in the form of mechanical ventilation. Among the 4192 study infants (94%) for whom outcomes were determined at 18 to 22 months, 49% died, 61% died or had profound impairment, and 73% died or had impairment. In multivariable analyses of infants who received intensive care, exposure to antenatal corticosteroids, female sex, singleton birth, and higher birth weight (per each 100-g increment) were each associated with reductions in the risk of death and the risk of death or profound or any neurodevelopmental impairment; these reductions were similar to those associated with a 1-week increase in gestational age. At the same estimated likelihood of a favorable outcome, girls were less likely than boys to receive intensive care. The outcomes for infants who underwent ventilation were better predicted with the use of the above factors than with use of gestational age alone. The likelihood of a favorable outcome with intensive care can be better estimated by consideration of four factors in addition to gestational age: sex, exposure or nonexposure to antenatal corticosteroids, whether single or multiple birth, and birth weight. (ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00063063 and NCT00009633.)Keywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Costs of Newborn Care in California: A Population-Based StudyPediatrics, 2006
- Multilevel Modeling and Practice-Based ResearchAnnals of Family Medicine, 2005
- Resuscitation Decisions for “Fetal Infants”Pediatrics, 2005
- Delivery room decision-making at the threshold of viabilityThe Journal of Pediatrics, 2004
- Ultrasound dating at 12–14 or 15–20 weeks of gestation? A prospective cross‐validation of established dating formulae in a population of in‐vitro fertilized pregnancies randomized to early or late dating scanUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2004
- ACOG practice bulletin number 38, September 2002: perinatal care at the threshold of viabilityObstetrics & Gynecology, 2002
- Inaccuracy of Ballard scores before 28 weeks’ gestationThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1999
- Obstetric determinants of neonatal survival: Influence of willingness to perform cesarean delivery on survival of extremely low-birth-weight infantsAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1997
- Estimating the date of confinement: Ultrasonographic biometry versus certain menstrual datesAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1996
- A simplified score for assessment of fetal maturation of newly born infantsThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1979