CHOICE AND TRANSFORMED INTERREINFORCEMENT INTERVALS
- 1 September 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
- Vol. 42 (2), 321-335
- https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1984.42-321
Abstract
Pigeons chose between two aperiodic, time-based schedules of reinforcement. The arithmetic mean interreinforcement interval of the first schedule was short, but the harmonic mean was long, whereas the arithmetic mean interreinforcement interval of the second schedule was long, but the harmonic mean was short. The pigeons preferred the schedule with the shorter harmonic mean in a concurrent-chains procedure when a terminal link ended after the first scheduled reinforcer had been gained on a terminal-link entry, but reversed their preferences, such that they preferred the schedule with the shorter arithmetic mean, when the terminal links ended after a fixed duration of exposure to the schedule. Moreover, the pigeons preferred the schedule with the shorter arithmetic mean in a two-key concurrent variable-interval variable-interval procedure, as well as in a concurrent variable-time variable-time, changeover-key procedure. The data suggest that an aggregate property of a schedule may not yield valid information about the responding that schedule will maintain as a choice alternative.Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- MATCHING, UNDERMATCHING, AND OVERMATCHING IN STUDIES OF CHOICEJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1979
- DEFINITION IN BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE: A REVIEW OF B. B. WOLMAN'S DICTIONARY OF BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1974
- CHAINED CONCURRENT SCHEDULES: REINFORCEMENT AS SITUATION TRANSITION1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1974
- THE CORRELATION‐BASED LAW OF EFFECT1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1973
- PREFERENCE FOR MIXED‐INTERVAL VERSUS FIXED‐INTERVAL SCHEDULES: NUMBER OF COMPONENT INTERVALS1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1972
- SOME EFFECTS OF RELATIVE REINFORCEMENT RATE AND CHANGEOVER DELAY IN RESPONSE‐INDEPENDENT CONCURRENT SCHEDULES OF REINFORCEMENT1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1968
- A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE RESPONDING MAINTAINED BY INTERVAL SCHEDULES OF REINFORCEMENT1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1968
- Reinforcement rate and immediacy of reinforcement as factors in choicePsychonomic Science, 1968
- CHOICE AND DELAY OF REINFORCEMENT1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1967
- EFFECTS OF DELAYED REINFORCEMENT IN A CONCURRENT SITUATION1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1965