Attitudes of the Japanese public and doctors towards use of archived information and samples without informed consent: Preliminary findings based on focus group interviews
Open Access
- 9 January 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Medical Ethics
- Vol. 3 (1), 1
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-3-1
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to explore laypersons' attitudes toward the use of archived (existing) materials such as medical records and biological samples and to compare them with the attitudes of physicians who are involved in medical research. Three focus group interviews were conducted, in which seven Japanese male members of the general public, seven female members of the general public and seven physicians participated. It was revealed that the lay public expressed diverse attitudes towards the use of archived information and samples without informed consent. Protecting a subject's privacy, maintaining confidentiality, and communicating the outcomes of studies to research subjects were regarded as essential preconditions if researchers were to have access to archived information and samples used for research without the specific informed consent of the subjects who provided the material. Although participating physicians thought that some kind of prior permission from subjects was desirable, they pointed out the difficulties involved in obtaining individual informed consent in each case. The present preliminary study indicates that the lay public and medical professionals may have different attitudes towards the use of archived information and samples without specific informed consent. This hypothesis, however, is derived from our focus groups interviews, and requires validation through research using a larger sample.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Attitudes and beliefs of african americans toward participation in medical researchJournal of General Internal Medicine, 1999
- Research Based on Archived Information and Samples1999
- Focus group interviews examining attitudes to randomised trials among breast cancer patients and the general communityAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 1998
- Patients' Views on Reference to Clinical DataJournal of Epidemiology, 1997
- What Ethical Issues are Japanese Epidemiologists Facing? Results of a Questionnaire Study for Members of the Monbusho Research Committee on Evaluation of Risk Factors for Cancer by Large-Scale Cohort Study.Journal of Epidemiology, 1996
- Recent Topics in JapanJournal of Epidemiology, 1996
- Qualitative Research: Introducing focus groupsBMJ, 1995
- Focus groups: a useful research method in general practice.1993
- Protection of research subjects: Do special rules apply in epidemiology?Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1991
- Ethical guidelines for epidemiologistsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1991