Racial Differences in Birth Weight of Term Infants in a Northern California Population
Open Access
- 1 April 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Perinatology
- Vol. 22 (3), 230-235
- https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7210703
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Census data show that an increasing proportion of the population of the United States is of Asian or Hispanic origin. Reference curves used to characterize fetal growth relative to gestational age are predominantly based on data for White infants. The goal of this study was to compare the birth weight distributions for term Asian or Hispanic infants with that for White infants, and to determine whether the prevalence of small (SGA) or large size(LGA) for gestational age differs between Asian or Hispanic and White infants. SETTING: A community hospital in Northern California. STUDY DESIGN: Data was collected prospectively from May 1 to September 13, 2000 on all singleton term infants born at this hospital. Gestational age was assessed by the best obstetrical estimate and ethnicity was determined by parental report. Infants were categorized as White, Hispanic, Chinese, Asian Indian, Other Asian, and Other. Birth weights, length, and head circumferences were compared using ANOVA and the Student–Newman–Keuls test. Differences in rates of diagnosis of SGA or LGA were assessed by chi square. RESULTS: 1539 infants were included in the study sample; 30% were White, 21% Asian Indian, 15% Chinese, 9% Hispanic, 7% other Asian, and 18% Other. Asian (Chinese, Asian Indian, or Other Asian), Hispanic, and Other babies had lower mean birth weights, shorter mean lengths, and smaller mean head circumferences than White babies. Asian, Hispanic, and Other male babies were lighter, shorter, and had smaller heads than white male babies. Asian females, but not Hispanic or Other ones, were lighter and had smaller head circumferences than White females; Asian Indian, Other Asian, and Other females had shorter lengths than White female infants. Indian and Other Asian, but not Chinese, babies were more likely than White babies to be SGA; babies in all three Asian groups were less likely than White babies to be LGA. CONCLUSION: Failure to account for ethnic differences in intrauterine growth may lead to inaccurate diagnosis of fetal growth abnormalities in infants of Asian ancestry.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- A united states national reference for fetal growthPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,2001
- Birth Weight in Relation to Morbidity and Mortality among Newborn InfantsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Birth-Weight-for-Gestational-Age Patterns by Race, Sex, and Parity in the United States PopulationObstetrics & Gynecology, 1995
- Update of Growth Percentiles for Infants Born in an Australian PopulationAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1994
- Differences in Gestational Age-Specific Birthweight among Chinese, Japanese and White AmericansInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1994
- Birth weight from pregnancies dated by ultrasonography in a multicultural British population.BMJ, 1993
- Growth graphs for the clinical assesment of infants of varying gestational ageThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1976
- Intrauterine growth curves: Intra- and international comparisons with different ethnic groups in CaliforniaPreventive Medicine, 1975
- Intrauterine growth of live-born Caucasian infants at sea level: Standards obtained from measurements in 7 dimensions of infants born between 25 and 44 weeksThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1969
- A practical classification of newborn infants by weight and gestational ageThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1967