Interim Analysis in Clinical Trials: The Role of the Likelihood Principle
- 1 May 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The American Statistician
- Vol. 41 (2), 117-122
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1987.10475458
Abstract
In the classical statistical approach, whether or not a clinician looks at accumulating data with the possibility of stopping the trial can affect any inferences drawn from the trial. This is in contrast to the Bayesian and likelihood approaches to statistics. I give examples to illustrate the differences in these approaches and discuss designing clinical trials from a Bayesian point of view.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Testing a Point Null Hypothesis: The Irreconcilability ofPValues and EvidenceJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1987
- Promising Results Halt Trial of Anti-AIDS DrugScience, 1986
- Interim analyses in clinical trials: Classical vs. bayesian approachesStatistics in Medicine, 1985
- Bandit problemsPublished by Springer Nature ,1985
- Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian AnalysisPublished by Springer Nature ,1985
- A Necessary and Sufficient Condition for Reaching a Consensus Using DeGroot's MethodJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1981
- Reaching a ConsensusJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1974
- The role of hypothesis testing in clinical trialsJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1966
- Sequential Medical TrialsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1963
- The Effect of 6-Mercaptopurine on the Duration of Steroid-induced Remissions in Acute Leukemia: A Model for Evaluation of Other Potentially Useful TherapyBlood, 1963