Options for differentiation of future commitments in climate policy: how to realise timely participation to meet stringent climate goals?
- 1 January 2001
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Climate Policy
- Vol. 1 (4), 465-480
- https://doi.org/10.3763/cpol.2001.0148
Abstract
This paper aims at exploring options for differentiation of future commitments in global greenhouse gas emissions control, linked to climate targets. This is done on the basis of theEUtarget of a maximum global temperature increase of 2°C compared to pre-industrial levels. The Framework to Assess International Regimes for the differentiation of commitments (FAIR) is used to explore the implications of two possible climate regimes: (1) increasing participation (i.e. a gradual increase in the number of parties involved and their level of commitment according to participation and differentiation rules) and (2) ‘contraction and convergence’ (C&C) with universal participation and a convergence of per capita emission permits. It is found that in a regime of increasing participation, stabilising the CO2 concentration at 450 ppmv by 2100 requires participation of major developing countries before 2050 in global emission control, irrespective of the participation and differentiation rules chosen. In the c...Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Greenhouse Gas Emissions in an Equity-, Environment- and Service-Oriented WorldTechnological Forecasting and Social Change, 2000
- International equity in climate change policyIntegrated Assessment, 2000
- A Triptych sectoral approach to burden differentiation; GHG emissions in the European bubbleEnergy Policy, 1998
- Can multi-criteria rules fairly distribute climate burdens?Energy Policy, 1998