Underreporting of energy intake in repeated 24-hour recalls related to gender, age, weight status, day of interview, educational level, reported food intake, smoking habits and area of living
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 1 August 2001
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Public Health Nutrition
- Vol. 4 (4), 919-927
- https://doi.org/10.1079/phn2001124
Abstract
Objective: The aims of the present study were (1) to evaluate the degree to which underreporting of energy intake by repeated 24-hour recalls was related to gender, age, weight status, day of interview, educational level, smoking habits and area of living, and (2) to compare the dietary characteristics of underreporters with those of others. Design: Cross-sectional study. Ten 24-hour recalls were performed during a one-year period. Setting: The Västerbotten intervention programme of cardiovascular disease and diabetes in Northern Sweden. Subjects: Ninety-four men and 99 women in four age groups: 30, 40, 50 and 60 years. Results: The prevalence of men and women with a food intake level (FIL; reported energy intake divided by estimated basal metabolic rate) below 1.2 was 44% and 47%, respectively. The youngest age group had higher FIL values than the oldest age group for both men (1.5 versus 1.1) and women (1.4 versus 1.1). The prevalence and magnitude of underreporting were directly related to body mass index (BMI; correlation coefficient: -0.47 (men) and -0.55 (women)). Smokers had a lower FIL value (1.1) than non-smokers (1.3). The nutrient density was lower for the group with high FIL values for protein and calcium and higher for fat and sucrose. The upper FIL group often had higher intake frequencies and larger portion sizes than the lower FIL group. Conclusions: Underreporting of energy intake is prevalent when 24-hour recalls are used, but the prevalence differs between sub-groups in the population. BMI was the main predictor of underreporting but also old age and smoking seem to contribute in this aspect. Socially desirable food items were not underreported to the same extent as socially undesirable food items. The intake frequencies and portion sizes partly explained the differences in FIL.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Critical evaluation of energy intake using the Goldberg cut-off for energy intake:basal metabolic rate. A practical guide to its calculation, use and limitationsInternational Journal of Obesity, 2000
- Psychological measures of eating behavior and the accuracy of 3 common dietary assessment methods in healthy postmenopausal womenThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2000
- Undereating and underrecording of habitual food intake in obese men: selective underreporting of fat intakeThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2000
- The association of energy intake bias with psychological scores of womenEuropean Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1999
- Shifting the distribution of risk: results of a community intervention in a Swedish programme for the prevention of cardiovascular diseaseJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1999
- Relationship between cigarette smoking and nutrient intakes and blood status indices of older people living in the UK: further analysis of data from the National Diet and Nutrition Survey of people aged 65 years and over, 1994/95Public Health Nutrition, 1999
- Assessment of selective under-reporting of food intake by both obese and non-obese women in a metabolic facilityInternational Journal of Obesity, 1998
- Who are the 'low energy reporters' in the dietary and nutritional survey of British adults?International Journal of Epidemiology, 1997
- Fruit, vegetables, and cancer prevention: A review of the epidemiological evidenceNutrition and Cancer, 1992
- Cessation from cigarette smoking: Changes in body weight, body composition, resting metabolism, and energy consumptionMetabolism, 1991