Psychiatry and ethics: The problematics of respect for religious meanings
- 1 September 1993
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry
- Vol. 17 (3), 363-383
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01380010
Abstract
Over the past two decades American psychiatrists have had to address the emergence of an increasingly fervent religious pluralism. Particularly in cases of socially controversial new religious movements (NRMs), distressed families have pressured psychiatrists to assess the mental state of recruits to such sects, often labeled “cults”. At this inevitably acrimonious interface between family values and religious liberties, psychiatrists have for the most part resisted pressures to medicalize religious conversions. This article provides an historical review of American psychiatric response to NRMs with respect to nosology and practice. It introduces this response in the more general context of ethics and the problematics of respect for religious meanings.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- DSM-III-R and religionSocial Science & Medicine, 1992
- Cult/Brainwashing Cases and Freedom of ReligionJournal of Church and State, 1991
- Religious Freedom in Contemporary AmericaJournal of Church and State, 1989
- Adult Burn Patients: The Role of Religion in RecoverySouthern Medical Journal, 1988
- RELIGION IN HEALINGSouthern Medical Journal, 1988
- Religious Life of Individuals With Affective Disorders*Southern Medical Journal, 1987
- The Making of a Moonie: Choice or Brainwashing?Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 1986
- The Once- and the Twice-Born: Self and Practice among Psychiatrists and Christian PsychiatristsPublished by Springer Nature ,1985
- New religions and the myth of mind control.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 1984
- Battle for the MindJournal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 1963