Dosimetry for ocular proton beam therapy at the Harvard Cyclotron Laboratory based on the ICRU Report 59
- 8 August 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Medical Physics
- Vol. 29 (9), 1953-1961
- https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1487425
Abstract
The Massachusetts General Hospital, the Harvard Cyclotron Laboratory (HCL), and the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary have treated almost 3000 patients with ocular disease using high-energy external-beam proton radiation therapy since 1975. The absorbed dose standard for ocular proton therapy beams at HCL was based on a fluence measurement with a Faraday cup (FC). A majority of proton therapy centers worldwide, however, use an absorbed dose standard that is based on an ionization chamber (IC) technique. The ion chamber calibration is deduced from a measurement in a reference 60Co photon field together with a calculated correction factor that takes into account differences in a chamber's response in 60Co and proton fields. In this work, we implemented an ionization chamber-based absolute dosimetry system for the HCL ocular beamline based on the recommendations given in Report 59 by the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. Comparative measurements revealed that the FC system yields an absorbed dose to water value that is 1.1% higher than was obtained with the IC system. That difference is small compared with the experimental uncertainties and is clinically insignificant. In June of 1998, we adopted the IC-based method as our standard practice for the ocular beam.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- UVEAL MELANOMASHematology/Oncology Clinics of North America, 2001
- Reply to the comments of L J Verhey on `Comparison of dosimetry recommendations for clinical proton beams'Physics in Medicine & Biology, 2000
- Comparison of episcleral plaque and proton beam radiation therapy for the treatment of choroidal melanomaOphthalmology, 1999
- What is the Role of Radiation in the Treatment of Subfoveal Membranes: Review of Radiobiologic, Pathologic, and Other Considerations to Initiate a Multimodality DiscussionInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1998
- Proton dosimetry comparison involving ionometry and calorimetryInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1997
- Faraday cup dosimetry in a proton therapy beam without collimationPhysics in Medicine & Biology, 1995
- Code of practice for clinical proton dosimetryRadiotherapy and Oncology, 1991
- Energy loss, range, path length, time-of-flight, straggling, multiple scattering, and nuclear interaction probabilityAtomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables, 1982