Pressure Sensor Drifts in Argo and Their Impacts
- 1 August 2011
- journal article
- Published by American Meteorological Society in Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
- Vol. 28 (8), 1036-1049
- https://doi.org/10.1175/2011jtecho831.1
Abstract
In recent years, autonomous profiling floats have become the prime component of the in situ ocean observing system through the implementation of the Argo program. These data are now the dominant input to estimates of the evolution of the global ocean heat content and associated thermosteric sea level rise. The Autonomous Profiling Explorer (APEX) is the dominant type of Argo float (~62%), and a large portion of these floats report pressure measurements that are uncorrected for sensor drift, the size and source of which are described herein. The remaining Argo float types are designed to automatically self-correct for any pressure drift. Only about 57% of the APEX float profiles (or ~38% Argo profiles) can be corrected, but this typically has not been done by the data centers that distribute the data (as of January 2009). A pressure correction method for APEX floats is described and applied to the Argo dataset. A comparison between estimates using the corrected Argo dataset and the publically available uncorrected dataset (as of January 2009) reveals that the pressure corrections remove significant regional errors from ocean temperature, salinity, and thermosteric sea level fields. In the global mean, 43% of uncorrectable APEX float profiles (or ~28% Argo profiles) appear to largely offset the effect of the correctable APEX float profiles with positive pressure drifts. While about half of the uncorrectable APEX profiles can, in principle, be recovered in the near future (after inclusion of technical information that allows for corrections), the other half have negative pressure drifts truncated to zero (resulting from firmware limitations), which do not allow for corrections. Therefore, any Argo pressure profile that cannot be corrected for biases should be excluded from global change research. This study underscores the ongoing need for careful analyses to detect and remove subtle but systematic errors in ocean observations.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Argo Program: Observing the Global Oceans with Profiling FloatsOceanography, 2009
- Global ocean heat content 1955–2008 in light of recently revealed instrumentation problemsGeophysical Research Letters, 2009
- On the Use of Satellite Altimeter Data in Argo Quality ControlJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 2009
- In Situ Calibration of Moored CTDs Used for Monitoring Abyssal WaterJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 2008
- How much is the ocean really warming?Geophysical Research Letters, 2007
- Recent cooling of the upper oceanGeophysical Research Letters, 2006
- Linear trends of zonally averaged thermosteric, halosteric, and total steric sea level for individual ocean basins and the world ocean, (1955–1959)–(1994–1998)Geophysical Research Letters, 2005
- From Swallow floats to Argo—the development of neutrally buoyant floatsDeep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 2005
- Argo profiling floats bring new era of in situ ocean observationsEos, 2004
- Robust Locally Weighted Regression and Smoothing ScatterplotsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1979