Comparative Analysis of Conceptualizations and Theories of Caring
- 1 June 1991
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Image: the Journal of Nursing Scholarship
- Vol. 23 (2), 119-126
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.1991.tb00655.x
Abstract
We delineated and compared various definitions of caring according to the five major conceptualizations of caring: caring as a human trait; caring as a moral imperative; caring as an affect; caring as an interpersonal interaction; and caring as an intervention. The implications of these diverse conceptualizations of caring for nursing practice are identified, and the commonalities, strengths and weaknesses discussed. It is concluded that caring is relatively undeveloped as a concept, has not been clearly explicated and often lacks relevance for nursing practice.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- The primacy of caring: Stress and coping in health and illness: by Patricia Benner and Judith Wrubel. Addison-Wesley, Menlo Park, Calif.Social Science & Medicine, 1990
- The experience of caringJournal of Advanced Nursing, 1989
- The theory of bureaucratic caring for nursing practice in the organizational cultureNursing Administration Quarterly, 1989
- Leininger's Theory of Nursing: Cultural Care Diversity and UniversalityNursing Science Quarterly, 1988
- Nursing Theories: A Critical ViewImage: the Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 1988
- Is a science of caring possible?Journal of Advanced Nursing, 1986
- FROM NOVICE TO EXPERTThe American Journal of Nursing, 1984
- Philosophy and nursingJournal of Advanced Nursing, 1980
- A charter for caringJournal of Advanced Nursing, 1976