The Single‐Tooth Implant: A Viable Alternative for Single‐Tooth Replacement
- 1 July 2002
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Periodontology
- Vol. 73 (7), 687-693
- https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2002.73.7.687
Abstract
The use of dental implants for single-tooth replacement cases introduces a challenge to the performance of these restorations. Clinical data suggest that single-tooth implant restorations do not benefit from lateral support from the surrounding dentition as do bridged implants, and that these restorations are subjected to greater masticatory forces. Therefore, single-tooth implants are exposed to an increased risk of failure. This prospective clinical trial was designed to evaluate the cumulative success rate of dual acid-etched single-tooth replacement implants in two clinical centers. The study protocol included 59 patients between 19 and 73 years. Implants were evaluated for mobility, infection, and crestal bone loss from 30.9 to 60 months. Seventy-one (71) implants were placed in 59 patients, 20 male and 39 female. Forty-seven (47) were placed in the maxilla and 24 in the mandible. The percentages of anterior and posterior implants were 45.1% and 54.9%, respectively. A total of 13 (18.4%) implants were placed in soft, poor quality (Type IV) bone. Beginning 1 month post-implant placement, cases were followed for 30.9 to 60 months with a mean follow-up of 45.9 months. One implant failed (peri-implant infection) yielding an overall success rate of 98.6%. This success rate for single-tooth replacement dual acid-etched implants compares favorably with bridged implants and with success rates of other single-tooth implant studies. Dual acid-etched implants performed well even under conditions of poor quality bone, where concomitant bone augmentation was performed, and when used for immediate replacement of extracted teeth.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- A prospective clinical evaluation of different single‐tooth restoration designs on osseointegrated implants. A 3‐year follow‐up of Brånemark implants.Clinical Oral Implants Research, 1999
- Single Tooth Replacement of Missing Molars: A Retrospective Study of 78 ImplantsThe Journal of Periodontology, 1999
- Evaluation of single‐tooth restorations on ITI dental implants. A prospective study of 29 patientsClinical Oral Implants Research, 1999
- Histomorphometric and removal torque analysis for TiO2hyphen;blasted titanium implants. An experimental study on dogs.Clinical Oral Implants Research, 1992
- Periodontal aspects of osseointegrated fixtures supporting a partial bridgeJournal of Clinical Periodontology, 1992
- Microbial differences in 2 clinically distinct types of failures of osseointegrated implantsClinical Oral Implants Research, 1991
- An Analysis of Clinical Studies on Resin-bonded BridgesJournal of Dental Research, 1991
- Clinical and microscopic findings in edentulous patients 3 years after incorporation of osseointegrated implant‐supported bridgeworkJournal of Clinical Periodontology, 1989
- Osseointegrated Oral ImplantsThe Journal of Periodontology, 1988
- Osseointegrated Titanium Implants:Requirements for Ensuring a Long-Lasting, Direct Bone-to-Implant Anchorage in ManActa Orthopaedica, 1981