Imputations of Deviance: A Retrospective Essay on the Labeling Perspective
- 1 October 1975
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Social Problems
- Vol. 23 (1), 1-11
- https://doi.org/10.2307/799623
Abstract
Edwin Lemert's and John Kitsuse's rather different uses of the term “imputation” are used to locate a central theoretical tension of the labeling perspective, one that has been most systematically expressed in labeling theorists' gingerly handling of the issue of actual deviance. In the process of attempting to reconcile this tension, the emergent labeling literature has curtailed the full advantages of Lemert's treatment of deviance and social control as separate, real-life events, on the one hand, and of Kitsuse's ethnomethodologically grounded stance, on the other.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reply to Chauncey and GoveAmerican Sociological Review, 1975
- The Labelling Theory of Mental Illness: A Reply to ScheffAmerican Sociological Review, 1975
- The Effects of Legal Processing on Delinquent OrientationsSocial Problems, 1974
- Crimes Without CriminalsLaw & Society Review, 1968
- Conceptions of Deviant Behavior: The Old and the NewThe Pacific Sociological Review, 1966
- Normal Crimes: Sociological Features of the Penal Code in a Public Defender OfficeSocial Problems, 1965
- A Note on the Uses of Official StatisticsSocial Problems, 1963
- Notes on the Sociology of DevianceSocial Problems, 1962
- Societal Reaction to Deviant Behavior: Problems of Theory and MethodSocial Problems, 1962