Improving Biological Control by Combining Biocontrol Agents Each with Several Mechanisms of Disease Suppression
Open Access
- 1 September 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Scientific Societies in Phytopathology®
- Vol. 92 (9), 976-985
- https://doi.org/10.1094/phyto.2002.92.9.976
Abstract
Two biocontrol agents, a yeast (Pichia guilermondii) and a bacterium (Bacillus mycoides), were tested separately and together for suppression of Botrytis cinerea on strawberry leaves and plants. Scanning electron microscopy revealed significant inhibition of Botrytis cinerea conidial germination in the presence of Pichia guilermondii, whereas Bacillus mycoides caused breakage and destruction of conidia. When both biocontrol agents were applied in a mixture, conidial destruction was more severe. The modes of action of each of the biocontrol agents were elucidated and the relative quantitative contribution of each mechanism to suppression of Botrytis cinerea was estimated using multiple regression with dummy variables. The improvement in control efficacy achieved by introducing one or more mechanisms at a time was calculated. Pichia guilermondii competed with Botrytis cinerea for glucose, sucrose, adenine, histidine, and folic acid. Viability of the yeast cells played a crucial role in suppression of Botrytis cinerea and they secreted an inhibitory compound that had an acropetal effect and was not volatile. Bacillus mycoides did not compete for any of the sugars, amino acids, or vitamins examined at a level that would affect Botrytis cinerea development. Viable cells and the compounds secreted by them contributed similarly to Botrytis cinerea suppression. The bacteria secreted volatile and non-volatile inhibitory compounds and activated the defense systems of the host. The nonvolatile compounds had both acropetal and basipetal effects. Mixture of Pichia guilermondii and Bacillus mycoides resulted in additive activity compared with their separate application. The combined activity was due to the summation of biocontrol mechanisms of both agents. This work provides a theoretical explanation for our previous findings of reduced disease control variability with a mixture of Pichia guilermondii and Bacillus mycoides.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Combining Biocontrol Agents to Reduce the Variability of Biological ControlPhytopathology®, 2001
- Comparison of Antagonists of Botrytis cinerea in Greenhouse-grown Cucumber and Tomato under Different Climatic ConditionsEuropean Journal of Plant Pathology, 1999
- Induced systemic resistance in Trichoderma harzianum T39 biocontrol of Botrytis cinereaEuropean Journal of Plant Pathology, 1998
- Mechanisms involved in the biological control ofBotrytis cinerea incited diseasesEuropean Journal of Plant Pathology, 1996
- Control of Infection and Sporulation ofBotrytis cinereaon Bean and Tomato by Saprophytic YeastsPhytopathology®, 1994
- Use of Trichoderma harzianum in combination or alternation with fungicides to control cucumber grey mould (Botrytis cinerea) under commercial greenhouse conditionsPlant Pathology, 1993
- Possible Role of Competition for Nutrients in Biocontrol of Pythium Damping-Off by BacteriaPhytopathology®, 1987
- Infection of strawberry flowers by Botrytis cinerea and its relevance to grey mould developmentAnnals of Applied Biology, 1986
- Factors Affecting the Production of Antifungal Compounds by Enterobacter aerogenes and Bacillus subtilis, Antagonists of Phytophthora cactorumJournal of Phytopathology, 1986
- Competition for nutrients between epiphytic micro-organisms and germination of spores of plant pathogens on beetroot leavesPhysiological Plant Pathology, 1977