Transplant candidate's clinical status rather than right ventricular function defines need for univentricular versus biventricular support
- 1 April 1996
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
- Vol. 111 (4), 773-783
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5223(96)70337-9
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hemodynamic and physiologic changes during support with an implantable left ventricular assist deviceThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1995
- HeartMate implantable left ventricular assist device: Bridge to transplantation and future applicationsThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1995
- Chronic mechanical circulatory support: Rehabilitation, low morbidity, and superior survivalThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1994
- Evolving Experience With Mechanical Circulatory SupportAnnals of Surgery, 1991
- Elevated Circulating Levels of Tumor Necrosis Factor in Severe Chronic Heart FailureNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- Experience with univentricular support in mortally ill cardiac transplant candidatesThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1990
- The Incidence of Isolated Left Ventricular Failure in Bridge-to-Transplant CandidatesAnnual Northeast Bioengineering Conference, 1989
- Evaluation of Right Ventricular Function During Clinical Left Ventricular AssistanceAnnual Northeast Bioengineering Conference, 1989
- Bridging to Cardiac Transplantation with Pulsatile Ventricular Assist DevicesThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1988
- Right heart interaction with the mechanically assisted left heartWorld Journal of Surgery, 1985