DISTANCE METHODS: A REPLY TO FARRIS

Abstract

- Farris (1985) claimed that my assertions about unbiasedness and consistency of estimates of a phylogeny obtained by least squares fitting are in error. The counterexample he constructed violates the assumptions of additivity and independence of distances which were clearly stated in my earlier paper. As such it is not a valid counterexample. It is argued, contrary to Farris's claims, that one need not avoid nonmetric distances, and that one should avoid negative branch lengths in estimates of phylogenies from distance data. Statistical tests of clockness, and, to a limited extent, of alternative phylogenies can be constructed, and these are demonstrated by example. A computer program to infer phylogenies from distance matrices has been in free distribution by me for several years; it seems as effective as the program recently announced by Farris. Information on phylogenies is present in distance data, as in other kinds of data, and statistical methods can be developed to extract it.