Poly(ethylene glycol)-Coated Hexadecylcyanoacrylate Nanospheres Display a Combined Effect for Brain Tumor Targeting
- 1 December 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Pharmacology & Experimental Therapeutics (ASPET) in Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
- Vol. 303 (3), 928-936
- https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.102.039669
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the tumor accumulation of radiolabeled long-circulating poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG)-coated hexadecylcyanoacrylate nanospheres and non-PEG-coated hexadecylcyanoacrylate nanospheres (used as control), after intravenous injection in Fischer rats bearing intracerebrally well established 9L gliosarcoma. Both types of nanospheres showed an accumulation with a retention effect in the 9L tumor. However, long-circulating nanospheres concentrated 3.1 times higher in the gliosarcoma, compared with non-PEG-coated nanospheres. The tumor-to-brain ratio of pegylated nanospheres was found to be 11, which was in accordance with the ratios reported for other carriers tested for brain tumor targeting such as long-circulating liposomes or labels for magnetic resonance imaging. In addition, a 4- to 8-fold higher accumulation of the PEG-coated carriers was observed in normal brain regions, when compared with control nanospheres. Using a simplified pharmacokinetic model, two different mechanisms were proposed to explain this higher concentration of PEG-coated nanospheres in a tumoral brain. 1) in the 9L tumor, the preferential accumulation of pegylated nanospheres was attributable to their slower plasma clearance, relative to control nanospheres. Diffusion/convection was the proposed mechanism for extravasation of the nanospheres in the 9L interstitium, across the altered blood-brain barrier. 2) In addition, PEG-coated nanospheres displayed an affinity with the brain endothelial cells (normal brain region), which may not be considered as the result of a simple diffusion/convection process. The exact underlying mechanism of such affinity deserves further investigation, since it was observed to be as important as specific interactions described for immunoliposomes with the blood-brain barrier.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- The blood-brain and blood-tumor barriers: A review of strategies for increasing drug deliveryNeuro-Oncology, 2000
- Liposomal distribution in malignant gliomaNuclear Medicine Communications, 1997
- Drug delivery through the blood-brain barrierAdvanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 1996
- Doxorubicin encapsulated in sterically stabilized liposomes for the treatment of a brain tumor model: biodistribution and therapeutic efficacyJournal of Neurosurgery, 1995
- Surface modification of nanoparticles to oppose uptake by the mononuclear phagocyte systemAdvanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 1995
- Liposome circulation time and tumor targeting: implications for cancer chemotherapyAdvanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 1995
- Nanocapsule formation by interfacial polymer deposition following solvent displacementInternational Journal of Pharmaceutics, 1989
- Microvascular permeability of normal and neoplastic tissuesMicrovascular Research, 1986
- Degradation of poly (isobutyl cyanoacrylate) nanoparticlesBiomaterials, 1984
- Adsorption of Antineoplastic Drugs to Polyalkylcyanoacrylate Nanoparticles and Their Release in Calf SerumJournal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 1979