Reuse of hemodialyzers. Results of nationwide surveillance for adverse effects
- 14 October 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 260 (14), 2073-2076
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.260.14.2073
Abstract
In 1986, the Centers of Disease Control, in collaboration with the Health Care Financing Administration, surveyed 1350 chronic hemodialysis centers in the United States to ascertain practices associated with the reuse of disposable hemodialyzers and the frequency of pyrongenic reactions and septicemia among patients. Reuse of hemodialyzers was reported by 63% of the centers. Centers that used RenNew-D (n = 5) for reprocessing hemodialyzers, compared with centers that did not reuse (n = 495), were more likely to report pyrogenic reactions (60% vs 13%) and episodes of septicemia (100% vs 55%) among their patients. Reusing hemodialyzers more than 20 times and, in some instances, also using manual reprocessing systems was significantly associated with clustering of pyrogenic reactions regardless of the type of germicide used. To detect membrane leaks developing after multiple reuses, air-pressure-leak tests should be performed on all reprocessed hemodialyzers.This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Infections with Mycobacterium chelonei in Patients Receiving Dialysis and Using Processed HemodialyzersThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1985
- Multiple use of dialyzers: Safety and efficacyKidney International, 1981
- Effect of multiple use of dialyzers on hepatitis B incidence in patients and staffJAMA, 1981
- Hemodialysis-Associated Hepatitis in the United States, 1974The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1977