Climbing Up The Pay-For-Performance Learning Curve: Where Are The Early Adopters Now?
- 1 November 2007
- journal article
- Published by Health Affairs (Project Hope) in Health Affairs
- Vol. 26 (6), 1674-1682
- https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.26.6.1674
Abstract
The diffusion of performance-based payment incentives is arguably the most striking change in the U.S. health care system since the managed care era. Because there is little knowledge about best practices, sponsors of payment-incentive programs must learn by doing. We examine the experiences of twenty-seven early adopters and profile the evolution of their pay-for-performance (P4P) strategies as well as perceptions of key lessons learned. Our findings suggest that leading-edge sponsors of P4P have expanded the reach of their efforts, particularly with regard to specialists, and increasingly are focused on outcome and cost-efficiency measures, rather than clinical process measures alone.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of Paying Physicians Based on their Relative Performance for QualityJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2007
- Pay for Performance in Commercial HMOsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2006
- Does Pay-for-Performance Improve the Quality of Health Care?Annals of Internal Medicine, 2006
- What Is the Empirical Basis for Paying for Quality in Health Care?Medical Care Research and Review, 2006
- Paying For Quality: Providers’ Incentives For Quality ImprovementHealth Affairs, 2004