Treatments for symptomatic urinary tract infections during pregnancy
- 20 October 2003
- reference entry
- Published by Wiley
- No. 3,p. CD002256
- https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd002256
Abstract
Urinary tract infections, including pyelonephritis, are serious complications that can result in significant maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. There is a large number of drugs, and combination of them, available to treat urinary tract infections, most of them tested in non-pregnant women. Attempts to define the optimal antibiotic regimen for pregnancy has, therefore, been problematic. The objective of this review was to try to determine, from the best available evidence from randomized control trials, which agent is most effective for the treatment of symptomatic urinary tract infections during pregnancy in terms of cure rates, recurrent infection, incidence of preterm delivery and premature rupture of membranes, admission to neonatal intensive care unit, need for change of antibiotic, and incidence of prolonged pyrexia. The Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and reference lists of articles were searched. All trials were considered where the intention was to allocate participants randomly to one of at least two alternative treatments for any symptomatic urinary tract infection. Trial quality assessment and data extraction were performed by the two reviewers. Five studies were included. There were no significant differences between studied treatments with regard to cure rates, recurrent infection, incidence of preterm delivery and premature rupture of membranes, admission to neonatal intensive care unit, need for change antibiotic and incidence of incidence of prolonged pyrexia. Although antibiotic treatment is effective for the cure of urinary tract infections, there are insufficient data to recommend any specific treatment regimen for symptomatic urinary tract infections during pregnancy. All of the antibiotics studied were shown to be very effective in decreasing the incidence of outcomes measured. Complications were very rare. All included trials had very small sample sizes to try to detect important differences between treatments. Future studies should evaluate the most promising antibiotics, in terms of class, timing, dose, acceptability, maternal and neonatal outcomes and costs.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Outpatient treatment of acute pyelonephritis in pregnancy after 24 weeks1Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1999
- A randomized trial of three antibiotic regimens for the treatment of pyelonephritis in pregnancyPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1998
- Randomized Clinical Trial of Antibiotic Therapy for Antenatal PyelonephritisInfectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1996
- Outpatient treatment of pyelonephritis in pregnancy: a randomized controlled trialObstetrics & Gynecology, 1995
- Pyelonephritis in pregnancy: Once-a-day ceftriaxone versus multiple doses of cefazolin: A randomized, double-blind trialAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1995
- 470 Pyelonephritis in Pregnancy: Once-A-Day Versus Multiple Dose TherapyAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1993
- Fosfomycin Trometamol versus Pipemidic Acid in the Treatment of Bacteriuria in PregnancyChemotherapy, 1990
- Single‐dose amoxycillin in the treatment of bacteriuria in pregnancy and the puerperium‐a controlled clinical trialBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1985
- Comparison of Pivmecillinam and Cephradine in Bacteriuria in Pregnancy and in Acute Urinary Tract InfectionScandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1979
- Double-blind Trial to Compare Ampicillin, Cephalexin, Co-trimoxazole, and Trimethoprim in Treatment of Urinary InfectionBMJ, 1972