Estimating Implementation and Operational Costs of an Integrated Tiered CD4 Service including Laboratory and Point of Care Testing in a Remote Health District in South Africa
Open Access
- 17 December 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 9 (12), e115420
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115420
Abstract
An integrated tiered service delivery model (ITSDM) has been proposed to provide ‘full-coverage’ of CD4 services throughout South Africa. Five tiers are described, defined by testing volumes and number of referring health-facilities. These include: (1) Tier-1/decentralized point-of-care service (POC) in a single site; Tier-2/POC-hub servicing processing 100 or >200 health-clinics, respectively. The objective of this study was to establish costs of existing and ITSDM-tiers 1, 2 and 3 in a remote, under-serviced district in South Africa. Historical health-facility workload volumes from the Pixley-ka-Seme district, and the total volumes of CD4 tests performed by the adjacent district referral CD4 laboratories, linked to locations of all referring clinics and related laboratory-to-result turn-around time (LTR-TAT) data, were extracted from the NHLS Corporate-Data-Warehouse for the period April-2012 to March-2013. Tiers were costed separately (as a cost-per-result) including equipment, staffing, reagents and test consumable costs. A one-way sensitivity analyses provided for changes in reagent price, test volumes and personnel time. The lowest cost-per-result was noted for the existing laboratory-based Tiers- 4 and 5 ($6.24 and $5.37 respectively), but with related increased LTR-TAT of >24–48 hours. Full service coverage with TAT <6-hours could be achieved with placement of twenty-seven Tier-1/POC or eight Tier-2/POC-hubs, at a cost-per-result of $32.32 and $15.88 respectively. A single district Tier-3 laboratory also ensured ‘full service coverage’ and <24 hour LTR-TAT for the district at $7.42 per-test. Implementing a single Tier-3/community laboratory to extend and improve delivery of services in Pixley-ka-Seme, with an estimated local ∼12–24-hour LTR-TAT, is ∼$2 more than existing referred services per-test, but 2–4 fold cheaper than implementing eight Tier-2/POC-hubs or providing twenty-seven Tier-1/POCT CD4 services.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Attrition through Multiple Stages of Pre-Treatment and ART HIV Care in South AfricaPLOS ONE, 2014
- Feasibility of Performing Multiple Point of Care Testing for HIV Anti-Retroviral Treatment Initiation and Monitoring from Multiple or Single FingersticksPLOS ONE, 2013
- Economic Evidence and Point-of-Care Testing.2013
- Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statementJournal of Medical Economics, 2013
- Impact on ART initiation of point‐of‐care CD4 testing at HIV diagnosis among HIV‐positive youth in Khayelitsha, South AfricaJournal of the International AIDS Society, 2013
- Same-Day CD4 Testing to Improve Uptake of HIV Care and Treatment in South Africa: Point-of-Care Is Not EnoughAIDS Research and Treatment, 2013
- The Reliability of Point-of-Care CD4 Testing in Identifying HIV-Infected Pregnant Women Eligible for Antiretroviral TherapyJAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 2012
- Performance evaluation of the Pima™ point‐of‐care CD4 analyser using capillary blood sampling in field tests in South AfricaJournal of the International AIDS Society, 2012
- Emerging technologies for point-of-care CD4 T-lymphocyte countingTrends in Biotechnology, 2011
- Patient Retention in Antiretroviral Therapy Programs in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic ReviewPLoS Medicine, 2007