Comparisons of Paper-Administered, Computer-Administered and Computerized Adaptive Achievement Tests
- 1 August 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Educational Computing Research
- Vol. 5 (3), 311-326
- https://doi.org/10.2190/86rk-76wn-vaj0-pfa3
Abstract
This research study was designed to compare student achievement scores from three different testing methods: paper-administered testing, computer-administered testing, and computerized adaptive testing. The three testing formats were developed from the California Assessment Program (CAP) item banks for grades three and six. The paper-administered and the computer-administered tests were identical in item content, format, and sequence. The computerized adaptive test was a tailored or adaptive sequence of the items in the computer-administered test.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Difficulty of Test Items That Measure More Than One AbilityApplied Psychological Measurement, 1985
- APPLICATION OF COMPUTERIZED ADAPTIVE TESTING TO EDUCATIONAL PROBLEMSJournal of Educational Measurement, 1984
- Developing a Common Metric in Item Response TheoryApplied Psychological Measurement, 1983
- Application of Item Response Models to Criterion-Referenced AssessmentApplied Psychological Measurement, 1983
- A comparison of conventional and automated administration of Raven’s Standard Progressive MatricesInternational Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 1982
- Adaptive EAP Estimation of Ability in a Microcomputer EnvironmentApplied Psychological Measurement, 1982
- Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters: Application of an EM algorithmPsychometrika, 1981
- Multicomponent latent trait models for ability testsPsychometrika, 1980
- A Comparison of Computer-Monitored Group Tests with Paper-and-Pencil TestsEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1976
- Normal ogive model on the continuous response level in the multidimensional latent spacePsychometrika, 1974