Evaluating New Treatments and Diagnostic Technologies in Obstetrics: Practical Problems, Ethics, and Solutions
- 1 July 1989
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
- Vol. 5 (3), 459-472
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462300007510
Abstract
This article develops arguments for the use of decision theory, rather than intuition, to determine the size of trials. It is wrong to expect doctors to ignore personal preferences in favor of clinical experiments unless the trial is capable of showing differences in treatment effect that would influence clinical practice substantially. It follows from our analysis that if delta (the treatment effect that the trial is designed to detect) is sufficient to alter clinical practice, then the alpha and beta errors of a trial should be equal. This applies even if a new treatment is to be compared with conventional therapy or if a treatment with high “costs” is compared with a less invasive or more inexpensive method.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- NewsBMJ, 1988
- Interim report of the Medical Research Council/Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists multicentre randomized trial of cervical cerclageBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1988
- Equipoise and the Ethics of Clinical ResearchNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- When a woman asks for a caesarean section.BMJ, 1987
- Prolonged pregnancy.BMJ, 1987
- RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF GENETIC AMNIOCENTESIS IN 4606 LOW-RISK WOMENThe Lancet, 1986
- Stones, lithotripters, trials, and arguments.BMJ, 1986
- CONTROLLED TRIAL OF TREATMENT OF RECURRENT SPONTANEOUS ABORTION BY IMMUNISATION WITH PATERNAL CELLSThe Lancet, 1985
- Size of clinical trials.BMJ, 1983
- Influence of Adherence to Treatment and Response of Cholesterol on Mortality in the Coronary Drug ProjectNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980