The diagnosis of “early” pancreatic cancer: The university of Chicago experience
- 15 March 1981
- Vol. 47 (S6), 1688-1697
- https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19810315)47:6+<1688::aid-cncr2820471438>3.0.co;2-d
Abstract
The results of a prospective study designed to investigate patients suspected of having pancreatic cancer are reported. One hundred and two of 238 patients investigated had pancreatic cancer. Ultrasonography, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, and cytology were the most reliable tests for the diagnosis of resectable cancer. Computed tomography had a higher sensitivity for unresectable cancer. Factors responsible for delay in diagnosis are discussed. Cancer of the body and tail of the pancreas cannot be diagnosed early by investigating a symptomatic population. Factors influencing mortality in patients who survive over three years following pancreatic resection are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prospective evaluation of some candidate tumor markers in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancerDigestive Diseases and Sciences, 1980
- Sensitivity and specificity of serum ribonuclease in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancerThe American Journal of Surgery, 1980
- VALUE OF NEW DIAGNOSTIC AIDS IN RELATION TO THE DISEASE PROCESS IN PANCREATIC CANCERThe Lancet, 1979
- A reappraisal of the value of carcinoembryonic antigen in the management of patients with various neoplasmsBritish Journal of Surgery, 1979
- A prospective study of glucose tolerance, insulin, C-peptide, and glucagon responses in patients with pancreatic carcinomaDigestive Diseases and Sciences, 1978
- Pancreatic cancer diagnosis: Preliminary evaluation of a prospective studyJournal of Surgical Research, 1976
- Elevated serum ribonuclease in patients with pancreatic cancer.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1976
- Adenocarcinoma of the PancreasAnnals of Surgery, 1975
- NEW ONCOFETAL ANTIGEN FOR HUMAN PANCREASThe Lancet, 1974
- Predictive Value of a Single Diagnostic Test in Unselected PopulationsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1966