Comparison between the colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis and healthy rectum: Clinical and physiological function
- 1 October 1997
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in British Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 84 (10), 1437-1441
- https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800841027
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Randomized Comparison of Straight and Colonic J Pouch Anastomosis After Low Anterior ResectionAnnals of Surgery, 1996
- Prospective randomized trial comparing J colonic pouch-anal anastomosis and straight coloanal reconstructionBritish Journal of Surgery, 1995
- Colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis after rectal excision for carcinoma: Functional outcomeBritish Journal of Surgery, 1995
- Functional results of coloanal anastomosis with reservoirDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1992
- Manovolumetric and sensory characteristics of the ileoanal J pouch compared with healthy rectumBritish Journal of Surgery, 1990
- Rectal reservoir and sensory function studied by graded isobaric distension in normal man.Gut, 1989
- Comparison of colonic reservoir and straight colo-anal reconstruction after rectal excisionBritish Journal of Surgery, 1988
- RECURRENCE AND SURVIVAL AFTER TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION FOR RECTAL CANCERThe Lancet, 1986
- Resection and colo-anal anastomosis with colonic reservoir for rectal carcinomaBritish Journal of Surgery, 1986
- Resection of the rectum with construction of a colonic reservoir and colo-anal anastomosis for carcinoma of the rectumBritish Journal of Surgery, 1986