Choosing a Parenteral Anticoagulant Agent
- 1 November 2001
- journal article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 345 (18), 1340-1342
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm200111013451811
Abstract
For decades, if a patient required a parenteral anticoagulant agent, the choice was simple: unfractionated heparin was the only such agent available. Unfractionated heparin has a long track record of effectiveness in both the treatment of and prophylaxis against arterial and venous thromboembolic disease. However, because of differences among batches of heparin and problems related to the bioavailability of the drug, monitoring of the anticoagulant effect of heparin has been not only necessary but also problematic. In addition, heparin-induced bleeding and thrombocytopenia can threaten life and limb. Moreover, there have always been problems with the use of unfractionated heparin to . . .Keywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- Fondaparinux Compared with Enoxaparin for the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism after Hip-Fracture SurgeryNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Fondaparinux Compared with Enoxaparin for the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism after Elective Major Knee SurgeryNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- A Synthetic Pentasaccharide for the Prevention of Deep-Vein Thrombosis after Total Hip ReplacementNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001