Apperception and Imagery in Blindfold Chess
- 1 January 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Memory
- Vol. 6 (1), 67-90
- https://doi.org/10.1080/741941600
Abstract
Apperception constructs functional and “meaningful” mental representations. These representations are often built on mental images. Hence it is rational to assume that the contents of some parts of images may be functionally more important than others. This means that the cognitive processing of some parts of the image is more effective than for others. To extract this preferential structure, which we call the functional figure in mental images, five experiments were conducted on blindfold chess imagery. We showed that blindfold chess players have much better recall of functionally significant than of functionally insignificant areas of chess positions. Thus, of the various mental representations of chess board areas, the functionally more significant areas are better represented than others.Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Apperception in chess players' long-range planningThe European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 1994
- Stroop-like interference in chess players' imagery: An unexplored possibility to be revealed by the adapted moving-spot taskPsychological Research, 1992
- Error in chess: The apperception-restructuring viewPsychological Research, 1992
- Theories of chess skillPsychological Research, 1992
- Visuospatial and articulatory interference in chess players' information intakeApplied Cognitive Psychology, 1992
- “Mental abacus”: The effect of abacus training on Chinese children's mental calculationCognitive Psychology, 1984
- The generality of the levels of processing hypothesis: An application to memory for chess positionsMemory & Cognition, 1979
- Arguments concerning representations for mental imagery.Psychological Review, 1978
- Converging evidence for the functional significance of imagery in problem solvingCognition, 1975
- An Investigation of Visual Search as a Means of Analyzing HeuristicsSoviet Psychology, 1966