The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: results of an international guideline-based performance improvement program targeting severe sepsis
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 13 January 2010
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in Intensive Care Medicine
- Vol. 36 (2), 222-231
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-009-1738-3
Abstract
Objective The Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC or “the Campaign”) developed guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock. A performance improvement initiative targeted changing clinical behavior (process improvement) via bundles based on key SSC guideline recommendations on process improvement and patient outcomes. Design and setting A multifaceted intervention to facilitate compliance with selected guideline recommendations in the ICU, ED, and wards of individual hospitals and regional hospital networks was implemented voluntarily in the US, Europe, and South America. Elements of the guidelines were “bundled” into two sets of targets to be completed within 6 h and within 24 h. An analysis was conducted on data submitted from January 2005 through March 2008. Main results Data from 15,022 subjects at 165 sites were analyzed to determine the compliance with bundle targets and association with hospital mortality. Compliance with the entire resuscitation bundle increased linearly from 10.9% in the first site quarter to 31.3% by the end of 2 years (P < 0.0001). Compliance with the entire management bundle started at 18.4% in the first quarter and increased to 36.1% by the end of 2 years (P = 0.008). Compliance with all bundle elements increased significantly, except for inspiratory plateau pressure, which was high at baseline. Unadjusted hospital mortality decreased from 37 to 30.8% over 2 years (P = 0.001). The adjusted odds ratio for mortality improved the longer a site was in the Campaign, resulting in an adjusted absolute drop of 0.8% per quarter and 5.4% over 2 years (95% CI, 2.5–8.4%). Conclusions The Campaign was associated with sustained, continuous quality improvement in sepsis care. Although not necessarily cause and effect, a reduction in reported hospital mortality rates was associated with participation. The implications of this study may serve as an impetus for similar improvement efforts.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Intensive versus Conventional Glucose Control in Critically Ill PatientsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- Improvement in Process of Care and Outcome After a Multicenter Severe Sepsis Educational Program in SpainJAMA, 2008
- Facilitating clinician adherence to guidelines in the intensive care unitCritical Care Medicine, 2008
- Outcome of Septic Shock in Older Adults After Implementation of the Sepsis “Bundle”Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2008
- Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008Intensive Care Medicine, 2007
- Practice guidelines as multipurpose tools: A qualitative study of noninvasive ventilation*Critical Care Medicine, 2007
- Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock*Critical Care Medicine, 2006
- Implementation and outcomes of the Multiple Urgent Sepsis Therapies (MUST) protocol*Critical Care Medicine, 2006
- Ventilation with Lower Tidal Volumes as Compared with Traditional Tidal Volumes for Acute Lung Injury and the Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Why Don't Physicians Follow Clinical Practice Guidelines?JAMA, 1999