The force-interval relationship of the left ventricle.
- 31 July 1979
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 60 (2), 334-348
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.60.2.334
Abstract
The force-interval relationship, the dependence of cardiac contractility on the rate and pattern of stimulation, was independent of preload but sensitive to the inotropic and disease state of the heart. The force-interval relationship was evaluated for the left ventricles of 42 patients, ages 1.5-20 yr, during cardiac catheterization using a micromanometer pressure transducer-tipped catheter and an atrial pacing electrode catheter. The left ventricular (LV) minor axis was monitored echocardiographically and the end-diastolic dimension (EDD) and posterior wall thickness (PW) were measured. Hearts were paced at a variety of basic cycle intervals to (1/heart rate) and 2 test stimuli were introduced at various times during a pause in the regular stimulation (test intervals t1 and t2 were measured relative to the last regular systole before the pause). For t1 < to and t2 .gtoreq. t1 + to, .ovrhdot.Pmax [1st derivative of the maximum left ventricular pressure] of the 2nd test systole was greater than .ovrhdot.Pmax for the last regular systole before the pause (equivalent to postextrasystolic potentiation). The ratio of these values of .ovrhdot.Pmax (test to regular) for systoles with equal LVEDD, the force-interval ratio was used to characterize the relationship. Patients were divided into 3 groups: group 1 (n = 17) patients had normal LVEDD, LVPW and pressure indices. Group 2 (n = 17) patients had increased LVEDD or LVPW but normal pressure indices. Group 3 (n = 4) patients had increased LVEDD and depressed pressure indices. The force-interval relationship was similar for groups 1 and 2: .ovrhdot.Pmax increased monotonically with t1 or t2. The force-interval ratio was larger for group 2. The relationship for group 3 was different. .ovrhdot.Pmax was a biphasic function of the test interval increasing for small values of t1 or t2 and decreasing for larger values of t1. The force-interval ratio was smaller than or equal to unity for short values of t1. This postextrasystolic depression was never found in groups 1 or 2.This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- CATECHOLAMINE EFFECT ON THE FORCE-INTERVAL RELATIONSHIPPediatric Research, 1977
- The force of contraction of isolated papillary muscle: A study of the interaction of its determining factorsJournal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, 1977
- Statistical analysis of the different factors which could affect postextrasystolic potentiation in the human heartAmerican Heart Journal, 1976
- Cardiac muscle: An attempt to relate structure to function,Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, 1976
- Great vessel, cardiac chamber, and wall growth patterns in normal children.Circulation, 1975
- Frequency potentiation and postextrasystolic potentiation in patients with and without coronary arterial disease.Heart, 1975
- Quantitative evaluation of postectopic beats in the normal and failing human heart using indices derived from catheter-tip manometer readingsCardiovascular Research, 1975
- Left ventricular function in chronic constrictive pericarditisThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1974
- Force-Frequency RelationshipCirculation Research, 1973
- Relation of Variations in Activation Order to Intraventricular Pressures during Premature BeatsCirculation Research, 1966