Performing meta-analysis with incomplete statistical information in clinical trials
Open Access
- 18 August 2008
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Vol. 8 (1), 56
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-56
Abstract
Results from clinical trials are usually summarized in the form of sampling distributions. When full information (mean, SEM) about these distributions is given, performing meta-analysis is straightforward. However, when some of the sampling distributions only have mean values, a challenging issue is to decide how to use such distributions in meta-analysis. Currently, the most common approaches are either ignoring such trials or for each trial with a missing SEM, finding a similar trial and taking its SEM value as the missing SEM. Both approaches have drawbacks. As an alternative, this paper develops and tests two new methods, the first being the prognostic method and the second being the interval method, to estimate any missing SEMs from a set of sampling distributions with full information. A merging method is also proposed to handle clinical trials with partial information to simulate meta-analysis.Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Intraocular pressure-lowering efficacy of bimatoprost 0.03% and travoprost 0.004% in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertensionBritish Journal of Ophthalmology, 2006
- Comparing bimatoprost and travoprost in black AmericansCurrent Medical Research and Opinion, 2006
- Local Model Uncertainty and Incomplete-Data Bias (With Discussion)Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 2005
- Uncertainty method improved on best–worst case analysis in a binary meta-analysisJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2005
- Improvement of Cardiovascular Risk Markers by Pioglitazone Is Independent From Glycemic ControlJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2005
- Long-term therapy with addition of pioglitazone to metformin compared with the addition of gliclazide to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, comparative studyDiabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews, 2005
- Sustained effects of pioglitazone vs. glibenclamide on insulin sensitivity, glycaemic control, and lipid profiles in patients with Type 2 diabetesDiabetic Medicine, 2004
- Missing at random, likelihood ignorability and model completenessThe Annals of Statistics, 2004
- A 12-month, randomized, double-masked study comparing latanoprost with timolol in pigmentary glaucomaOphthalmology, 1999
- Therapeutic Comparison of Metformin and Sulfonylurea, Alone and in Various Combinations: A double-blind controlled studyDiabetes Care, 1994