SF-36 health survey reliability, validity and norms for New Zealand
- 1 August 1999
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
- Vol. 23 (4), 401-406
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-842x.1999.tb01282.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Factor Structure of the SF-36 Health Survey in 10 CountriesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1998
- Is the SF-36 a valid measure of change in population health? Results from the Whitehall II studyBMJ, 1997
- German translation and psychometric testing of the SF-36 Health Survey: Preliminary results from the IQOLA projectSocial Science & Medicine, 1995
- The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey—I. Evaluation of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability and construct validity across general populations in SwedenSocial Science & Medicine, 1995
- The SF‐36 in an Australian sample: validating a new, generic health status measureAustralian Journal of Public Health, 1995
- The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of Data Quality, Scaling Assumptions, and Reliability Across Diverse Patient GroupsMedical Care, 1994
- An Introduction to the BootstrapPublished by Springer Nature ,1993
- Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care.BMJ, 1992
- The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Medical Care, 1992