Control Dynamics and Timing a Discrete Motor Response
- 1 June 1969
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Motor Behavior
- Vol. 1 (2), 119-134
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.1969.10734840
Abstract
Altering the resistive dynamics of a handle moved 60 cm. to fill a 2-sec. interval manipulated the proprioceptive feedback (PFB) from the response. Spelling aloud 2-, 3-, and 4-letter words during the motor response prevented overt counting. 84 11-14 year old boys were given immediate KR, the lapsed time for the motor response, for 50 or 60 trials according to the design. Only the condition reducing time varying PFB to a minimum, no movement and no spelling, prevented accurate timing of the responses, but above the minimal level, accuracy, consistency and rapidity of learning was increased by the addition of large resistances varying with velocity and acceleration.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Proprioception Variables as Determinants of Lapsed Time Estimation∗Ergonomics, 1968
- Proprioceptive Involvement, Psychophysical Method and Temporal JudgmentPerceptual and Motor Skills, 1963
- Anticipatory timing of continuous and discrete responses.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1962
- Kinesthetic Cues in the Development of Time ConceptsThe Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1958
- Reproduction of simple movements as a function of factors influencing proprioceptive feedback.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1955
- Accuracy of positioning responses as a function of spring loading in a control.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1955
- The effect of physical constants of a control on tracking performance.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1953
- An evaluation of experimental methods of time judgment.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1950
- Studies in time perception.Psychological Bulletin, 1946
- Some factors in estimating short time intervals.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1940