Changing from Snellen to LogMAR: debate or delay?
- 1 January 2006
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology
- Vol. 34 (1), 6-8
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9071.2006.01135.x
Abstract
Visual acuity is the most commonly used test to assess visual function. The Snellen chart is the universally accepted tool for testing visual acuity despite its poor reliability and reproducibility. Newer logMAR charts are now available that have negated the disadvantages of the Snellen chart. However, these charts are not being used regularly in daily practice. This article discusses the reasons for the delayed acceptance of the logMAR chart.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- How Sensitive to Clinical Change are ETDRS logMAR Visual Acuity Measurements?Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science, 2003
- The development of a "reduced logMAR" visual acuity chart for use in routine clinical practiceBritish Journal of Ophthalmology, 2001
- Contour interaction for high and low contrast optotypes in normal and amblyopic observersOphthalmic and Physiological Optics, 1999
- New Visual Acuity Charts for Clinical ResearchAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology, 1982
- Observer variation in ophthalmology.British Journal of Ophthalmology, 1980
- New Design Principles for Visual Acuity Letter ChartsOptometry and Vision Science, 1976
- Contour Interaction and Visual Resolution: Contralateral EffectsScience, 1963
- Visual Resolution and Contour Interaction*Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1963