The Schick Dose of Diphtheria Toxin as a Secondary Stimulus
- 1 June 1922
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Epidemiology and Infection
- Vol. 21 (1), 104-111
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022172400031284
Abstract
The injection of the small amount of diphtheria toxin used in the Schick test may act as a secondary stimulus. A Schick test may therefore cause a great and rapid increase in the immunity of the animals tested. Examples are quoted of six rabbits and twelve guinea-pigs in Tables II to VII. 2. A fraction of a Schick dose may act as a secondary stimulus. Rabbit G 23 quoted in Table IV, injected with 1/10 of a Schick dose, showed an immunity response, the antitoxic content of its blood rising from 1/50 to nearly 1/10 unit per c.c. in six days. 3. The action of a Schick dose as a secondary stimulus may cause an animal to give a negative reaction when tested seven days or more after the first positive reaction. This is illustrated by rabbits G 7 in Table III, G 31 in Table II, G 32 and G 34 in Table V and four guinea-pigs in Table VI. 4. The antigenic value of a Schick dose of toxin as a secondary stimulus may be as high as that of a reasonable dose of a toxin-antitoxin mixture suitable for human immunisation. Examples are given comparing the results of the injection of a Schick dose of toxin and of a toxin-antitoxin mixture in the same rabbit in Table III, in different rabbits, G 20 and G 22 in Table IV and reference is made to the companion rabbits to those quoted in Table V. 5. The antigenic value of a Schick dose as a secondary stimulus can be demonstrated: A. In animals which have not produced a detectable quantity of antitoxin (that is less than 1/2000 of a unit per c.c.) as the result of a primary stimulus. See both rabbits in Table II, rabbit G 20 in Table IV, both rabbits in Table V, and guinea-pig FF 19. v in Table VII. The four guinea-pigs in Table VI probably come under the same heading. B. In animals whose actively produced antitoxin has fallen below a de tectable level. See rabbit G 7 in Table III. (These results add further confirmation to the phenomenon reported in the paper “Active immunity to diphtheria in the absence of detectable antitoxin” (Glenny and Allen, 1922). 6. A Schick dose of toxin which gives a positive reaction may, by acting as a secondary stimulus, produce a rapid increase in the antitoxic value of animals already containing some actively produced antitoxin. See guinea-pig LL 17. vi in Table VII. 7. A Schick dose of toxin which causes no reaction may, by acting as a secondary stimulus, produce a rapid increase in the antitoxic value of animals already containing some actively produced antitoxin. See guinea-pigs in Table VII. 8. A Schick dose of toxin may fail as a secondary stimulus if the antitoxic content at the time of injection is comparatively high. See rabbit G 21 in Table IV.Keywords
This publication has 2 references indexed in Scilit:
- Active Immunity to Diphtheria in the Absence of Detectable AntitoxinEpidemiology and Infection, 1922
- Notes on the Production of Immunity to Diphtheria ToxinEpidemiology and Infection, 1921