Interpreting Aggregate Wage Growth: The Role of Labor Market Participation
- 1 August 2003
- journal article
- Published by American Economic Association in American Economic Review
- Vol. 93 (4), 1114-1131
- https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803769206223
Abstract
A new and easily implementable framework for the empirical analysis of the relationship between aggregate and individual wages is developed. Aggregate real wages are shown to contain three important bias terms: one associated with the dispersion of individual wages, a second deriving from compositional changes in the (selected) sample of workers, and a third reflecting the distribution of working hours. Their importance for interpreting the path of aggregate wages and of the returns to education for recent experience in Britain is highlighted. A close correspondence between the estimated biases and the patterns of differences shown by aggregate wages is established.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Can Falling Supply Explain the Rising Return to College for Younger Men? A Cohort-Based AnalysisThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2001
- The Changing Distribution of Male Wages in the U.K.The Review of Economic Studies, 2000
- Measuring the Cyclicality of Real Wages: How Important is Composition Bias?The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1994
- Semiparametric estimation of censored selection models with a nonparametric selection mechanismJournal of Econometrics, 1993
- Root-N-Consistent Semiparametric RegressionEconometrica, 1988
- Real Wages over the Business Cycle: Evidence from Panel DataJournal of Political Economy, 1985
- Fixed Costs and Labor SupplyEconometrica, 1981
- Shadow Prices, Market Wages, and Labor SupplyEconometrica, 1974
- SOME THOUGHTS ON THE DISTRIBUTION OF EARNINGS 1Oxford Economic Papers, 1951