Rotational delivery of the fetus: Kielland's forceps and two other methods compared
- 1 July 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Vol. 89 (7), 501-506
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1982.tb03648.x
Abstract
A retrospective comparison was undertaken of 552 cases in which Kielland's forceps were used for rotation and delivery, 95 cases in which other forceps were used for rotation and delivery, and 160 cases in which manual rotation and forceps were used. There was no significant difference in maternal or fetal morbidity between the three groups, regardless of whether the indication for delivery was delay in the second stage of labour or fetal distress. When Kielland's forceps were used by junior staff, significantly more vaginal and cervical lacerations and primary postpartum haemorrhage occurred, but there was no increase in fetal morbidity.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Kielland's forceps: association with neonatal morbidity and mortality.BMJ, 1979
- Kielland's forceps: role of antenatal factors in prediction of use.BMJ, 1979
- AN OBSTETRICIAN'S VIEW OF PAINBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1975
- SPINAL CORD INJURY OF THE FETUS DURING DELIVERY WITH KIELLAND'S FORCEPSBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1974