Permissible Daily Airborne Particle Mass Levels Encompass Brief Excursions to the “London Fog” Range, Which May Contribute to Daily Mortality and Morbidity in Communities
- 1 June 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Applied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene
- Vol. 13 (6), 385-394
- https://doi.org/10.1080/1047322x.1998.10389562
Abstract
PM10 levels within the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) 24-hour, 150-μg/M3 standard have been associated with mortality and morbidity, which remain causally unexplained. EPA's standard, refocused on PM2.5, has been adjusted downward, assuming that effects observed daily are caused by daily exposures. Real-time particulate matter (PM) monitoring was used to inquire whether 24-hour average PM levels might encompass brief, health-significant excursions. Data from Birmingham, Alabama; Penticton, British Columbia; and Zeebrugge, Belgium, revealed many excursions, one reaching 2000 μg/M3 or twice the level in the lethal 1952 London fog. Harm from brief exposure to PM in the range of observed excursions was demonstrated experimentally in people, dogs, and rats. In rats, the area of lung surface developing lesions was elevated when the 4-hour average aerosol dose rate included a short-term burst. Elevations were observed with each of two aerosols, and were more pronounced with four excursions than with one excursion. In another study, short-term PM exposure killed rats. In dogs, short-term PM exposure caused serious electrocardiogram changes. In humans, asthma symptoms were associated with PM levels, but the strength of the association increased as PM averaging time decreased from 24 hours to 8 hours to 1 hour. Short-term human response to PM also was evident when 300 people were overcome after wind lofted particles into the air during a 4-day outdoor music festival in Queen Creek, Arizona, in April 1997. These findings support four conclusions: (1) EPA's decision to change the PM standard may be justified by residual health risks associated with the old standard. (2) The time required for PM to cause adverse effects may be briefer than the time interval over which the effects are observed. (3) Greater risk reduction would appear to be achievable via control of 1-hour PM averages than 24-hour averages. (4) Additional study of PM excursions is needed.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Airborne Particle Excursions Contributing to Daily Average Particle Levels may be Managed via a 1 hr Standard, with Possible Public Health BenefitsAerosol Science and Technology, 1996
- Sulfuric Acid Aerosol Followed by Ozone Exposure in Healthy and Asthmatic SubjectsEnvironmental Research, 1995
- Acute Respiratory Effects of Particulate Air PollutionAnnual Review of Public Health, 1994
- Controlled Exposures of Volunteers to Respirable Carbon and Sulf uric Acid AerosolsJournal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 1992
- Daily Mortality and PM10 Pollution in Utah ValleyArchives of environmental health, 1992
- Acute Health Effects of PM10Pollution on Symptomatic and Asymptomatic ChildrenAmerican Review of Respiratory Disease, 1992
- Lack of Bronchoconstrictor Response to Sulfuric Acid Aerosols and FogsAmerican Review of Respiratory Disease, 1991
- Acute pulmonary response in healthy, nonsmoking adults to inhalation of formaldehyde and carbonJournal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, 1989
- Acidity Potentiates Bronchoconstriction Induced by Hypoosmolar AerosolsAmerican Review of Respiratory Disease, 1988
- The Roles of pH and Ionic Species in Sulfur Dioxide- and Sulfite-Induced BronchoconstrictionAmerican Review of Respiratory Disease, 1987