Biocompatibility of Resin-Modified Filling Materials
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 1 July 2000
- journal article
- other
- Published by SAGE Publications in Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine
- Vol. 11 (3), 333-355
- https://doi.org/10.1177/10454411000110030401
Abstract
Increasing numbers of resin-based dental restorations have been placed over the past decade. During this same period, the public interest in the local and especially systemic adverse effects caused by dental materials has increased significantly It has been found that each resin-based material releases several components into the oral environment. In particular, the comonomer triethyleneglycol di-methacrylate (TEGDMA), and the 'hydrophilic' monomer, 2-hydroxy-ethyl-methacrylate (HEMA), are leached out from various composite resins and 'adhesive' materials (e.g., resin-modified glass-ionomer cements [GICs] and dentin adhesives) in considerable amounts during the first 24 hours after polymerization. Numerous unbound resin components may leach into saliva during the initial phase after polymerization, and later, due to degradation or erosion of the resinous restoration. Those substances may be systemically distributed and could potentially cause adverse systemic effects in patients. In addition, absorption of organic substances from unpolymerized material, through unprotected skin due to manual contact may pose a special risk for dental personnel. This is borne out by the increasing numbers of dental nurses, technicians, and dentists who present with allergic reactions to one or more resin components like HEMA glutaraldehyde ethyleneglycol di-methacrylate (EGDMA), and dibenzoyl peroxide (DPO). However, it must be emphasized that except for conventional composite resins, data reported on the release of substances from resin-based materials are scarce. There is very little reliable information with respect to the biological interactions between resin components and various tissues. Those interactions may be either protective, like absorption to dentin, or detrimental, e.g., inflammatory reactions of soft tissues Microbial effects have also been observed which may contribute indirectly to caries and irritation of the pulp. Therefore, it is critical, both for our patients and for the profession, that the biological effects of resin-based filling materials be clarified in the near futureKeywords
This publication has 139 references indexed in Scilit:
- Biological aspects of root canal filling materials - histocompatibility, cytotoxicity, and mutagenicityClinical Oral Investigations, 1997
- Mutagenicity of dentin bonding agentsJournal of Biomedical Materials Research, 1994
- Five-year clinical study of u.v.-polymerized posterior compositesJournal of Dentistry, 1991
- Incidence of adverse effects of dental materialsEuropean Journal of Oral Sciences, 1991
- Evaluation of Mutagenicity of Restorative Dental Materials Using the Ames Salmonella/Microsome TestJournal of Dental Research, 1990
- The reaction of skin to primers used in the “single-step” bonding systemsAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1987
- Support for and implications of the specific plaque hypothesisEuropean Journal of Oral Sciences, 1985
- Monkey pulpal response to composite resin restorations in cavities treated with various cleansing agentsEuropean Journal of Oral Sciences, 1979
- Threshold responses in formaldehyde-sensitive subjectsJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 1979
- Embryonic-Fetal Toxicity and Teratogenic Effects of a Group of Methacrylate Esters in RatsJournal of Dental Research, 1972