Reinforcing flood–risk estimation
- 24 May 2002
- journal article
- review article
- Published by The Royal Society in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
- Vol. 360 (1796), 1373-1387
- https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2002.1005
Abstract
Flood-frequency estimation is inherently uncertain. The practitioner applies a combination of gauged data, scientific method and hydrological judgement to derive a flood-frequency curve for a particular site. The resulting estimate can be thought fully satisfactory only if it is broadly consistent with all that is reliably known about the flood-frequency behaviour of the river. The paper takes as its main theme the search for information to strengthen a flood-risk estimate made from peak flows alone. Extra information comes in many forms, including documentary and monumental records of historical floods, and palaeological markers. Meteorological information is also useful, although rainfall rarity is difficult to assess objectively and can be a notoriously unreliable indicator of flood rarity. On highly permeable catchments, groundwater levels present additional data. Other types of information are relevant to judging hydrological similarity when the flood-frequency estimate derives from data pooled across several catchments. After highlighting information sources, the paper explores a second theme: that of consistency in flood-risk estimates. Following publication of the Flood estimation handbook, studies of flood risk are now using digital catchment data. Automated calculation methods allow estimates by standard methods to be mapped basin-wide, revealing anomalies at special sites such as river confluences. Such mapping presents collateral information of a new character. Can this be used to achieve flood-risk estimates that are coherent throughout a river basin?Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assessing the effectiveness of hydrological similarity measures for flood frequency analysisJournal of Hydrology, 2001
- Applying Probability Determination to Refine Landslide-triggering Rainfall Thresholds Using an Empirical “Antecedent Daily Rainfall Model”Pure and Applied Geophysics, 2000
- Paleoflood Hydrology and the Estimation of Extreme FloodsPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,2000
- The formation of groups for regional flood frequency analysisHydrological Sciences Journal, 2000
- RIVER FLOOD FREQUENCY ESTIMATION USING CONTINUOUS RUNOFF MODELLING.Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Water, Maritime and Energy, 1999
- A statistical comparison of wind speed, wave height, and wave period derived from satellite altimeters and ocean buoys in the Gulf of Mexico regionJournal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 1998
- Regional Frequency AnalysisPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1997
- Estimating Probable Maximum Floods in the Upper Santa Ana Basin, Southern California, From Stream Boulder SizeEnvironmental & Engineering Geoscience, 1996
- Statistical Analysis of Circular DataPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1993
- Evaluation of regional flood frequency analysis with a region of influence approachWater Resources Research, 1990