Cost Analysis of Breath Test versus Endoscopy for Dyspepsia
- 1 July 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by S. Karger AG in Digestion
- Vol. 65 (4), 207-212
- https://doi.org/10.1159/000063821
Abstract
Background: There is currently much debate on the best way to manage dyspepsia in the community and cost effectiveness is often discussed. We aim to perform a cost analysis of a test and treat strategy for Helicobacter pylori versus endoscopy using data based on the breath test service in Leicester. Methods: Retrospective analysis of data acquired over the 1-year period from March 1, 1999, to February 29, 2000, in a university teaching hospital. The main outcome measure was the cost of each management strategy. Results: Referral to the breath test service cost £84.67 per person with dyspepsia (including treatment of positive patients and endoscopy cost of patients endoscoped). If the breath test service had not existed, referral for endoscopy would have cost £98.35 per person. This equates to a cost saving of £8,276 over the year studied for the 605 patients referred. It also resulted in 353 fewer endoscopies being performed. Conclusion: Direct referral to a H. pylori breath test service saves money, avoids an unpleasant test for many people and reduces the endoscopy waiting list.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Helicobacter pylori and symptomatic relapse of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 2001
- Randomised controlled trial of Helicobacter pylori testing and endoscopy for dyspepsia in primaryBMJ, 2001
- Cost effectiveness of initial endoscopy for dyspepsia in patients over age 50 years: a randomised controlled trial in primary careThe Lancet, 2000
- Systematic review and economic evaluation of Helicobacter pylori eradication treatment for non-ulcer dyspepsiaBMJ, 2000
- Helicobacter pylori test-and-eradicate versus prompt endoscopy for management of dyspeptic patients: a randomised trialThe Lancet, 2000