Number of Lymph Node Metastases Determined by Presurgical Ultrasound and Endoscopic Ultrasound Is Related to Prognosis in Patients With Esophageal Carcinoma
- 1 November 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Annals of Surgery
- Vol. 234 (5), 613-618
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200111000-00005
Abstract
To analyze the impact on prognosis of the number of lymph node metastases detected by ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound in patients with esophageal carcinoma. Ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound are useful for diagnosing tumor depth and lymph node metastasis in patients with esophageal carcinoma. However, the clinical significance of the number of lymph node metastases before surgery has not been elucidated. The authors evaluated lymph node metastases using preoperative ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound in 329 consecutive patients who underwent esophagectomy with lymphadenectomy. TNM classification and one-to-one comparison of lymph node metastasis was performed between the preoperative and histologic diagnosis. The number of lymph node metastases was subdivided into four groups: zero, one to three, four to seven, and eight or more. The accuracy of preoperative ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound diagnosis exceeded 70% in each category of TNM classification. The incidence of lymph node metastasis determined by preoperative and histologic diagnosis was 69.0% (234/339) and 59.3% (201/339), respectively. The correlation between preoperative and histologic diagnosis was significant (P < .0001). According to the subdivision of number of lymph node metastases, the accuracy rates associated with nodal involvement of zero, one to three, four to seven, and eight or more were 83.8%, 59.7%, 43.3%, and 96.0%, respectively. The clinical outcome between ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound diagnosis and histologic diagnosis in stage grouping was almost similar. The 5-year survival rates of patients with zero, one to three, four to seven, and eight or more lymph node metastases determined by ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound were 53.3%, 33.8% 17.0%, and 0%, respectively. The differences among groups were statistically significant. The survival curves associated with preoperative and histologic diagnosis were similar. Not only the stage grouping of TNM classification but also the number of lymph node metastases determined by ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound before surgery may be useful for predicting prognosis in patients with esophageal carcinoma.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assessment of Cervical Lymph Node Metastasis in Esophageal Carcinoma Using UltrasonographyAnnals of Surgery, 1999
- Oesophageal cancer staging using endoscopic ultrasonographyBritish Journal of Surgery, 1998
- Outcomes of Extended Radical Esophagectomy for Thoracic Esophageal CancerJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 1998
- Ultrasonographic Detection of Lymph-Node Metastases in Superficial Carcinoma of the EsophagusEndoscopy, 1996
- Lymph Node Metastases in Gastric Cancer: Significance of Positive NumberOncology, 1995
- Endosonographic features predictive of lymph node metastasisGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1994
- Long-Term Results of Subtotal Esophagectomy with Three-Field Lymphadenectomy for Carcinoma of the Thoracic EsophagusAnnals of Surgery, 1994
- Improved assessment of supraclavicular and abdominal metastases in oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junction carcinoma with the combination of ultrasound and computed tomographyThe British Journal of Radiology, 1993
- Endosonography and computed tomography of esophageal carcinomaGastroenterology, 1989
- Ultrasonic detection of lymph node metastases in the region around the celiac axis in esophageal and gastric cancerJournal of Clinical Ultrasound, 1985