The Construct and Concurrent Validity of a Measure of Academic Self-Concept and One of Locus of Control for a Sample of University Students
- 1 September 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Educational and Psychological Measurement
- Vol. 46 (3), 735-744
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164486463031
Abstract
For a sample 239 undergraduate university students (135 males and 104 females) a factor analysis of the intercorrelations of 20 4-item subtests of the 5 scales (4 subtests per scale) of the Dimensions of Self-Concept (DOSC), Form H, an academic self-concept measure, and of 6 subtests from the Intellectual Achievement Responsibility Questionnaire (IAR), a locus of control measure, revealed 5 distinct factors that correspond to the 5 a priori dimensions afforded by the DOSC but only one factor for the IAR. With respect to 3 self-report measures of academic achievement, the Level of Aspiration scale of the DOSC yielded the only 2 validity coefficients in excess of .30. It was concluded that (a) the DOSC reflects 5 distinct factor dimensions consistent with a theory of academic self-concept proposed by Michael and Smith (1976) and (b) the IAR is a unidimensional measure quite independent of the DOSC.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Factorial Validity of the Dimensions of Self-Concept (DOSC) Measure for a Sample of Eighth-Grade Children and for One of Community College AdultsEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1984
- The Development and Validation of a Preliminary Research Form of an Academic Self-Concept Measure for College StudentsEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1984
- Cognitive and Affective Factor Dimensions in Each of Four High School Samples of Different EthnicityEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1980
- The Development and Preliminary Validation of Three Forms of a Self-Concept Measure Emphasizing School-Related ActivitiesEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1976