Social Europe after Maastricht: Is the United Kingdom really opted out?
- 1 January 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law
- Vol. 19 (1), 1-15
- https://doi.org/10.1080/09649069708410195
Abstract
The United Kingdom has for many years resisted the extension of social regulation from Brussels. This continuing resistance was highlighted at Maastricht by the negotiation of the social policy opt-out and the adoption by only eleven Member States, excluding the United Kingdom, of the Social Policy Agreement. This article considers the issues which those arrangements raise, concerning the constitutional character of Social Europe and the United Kingdom's place in it. It is argued that, although the United Kingdom has no obligations arising directly from the Social Policy Agreement, the effects of its social policy opt-out are limited by its existing Treaty obligations with respect to social legislation and by the impact of an increasingly multi-national industrial environment in which workers and management have an important role to play in the formulation and implementation of social policy.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Right vs Efficiency? The Economic Case for Transnational Labour StandardsIndustrial Law Journal, 1994
- The European Community Between Social Policy and Social RegulationJCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 1993
- The Constitutional Structure of the Union: A Europe of Bits and PiecesCommon Market Law Review, 1993
- The Concept of Citizenship in the Treaty on European UnionCommon Market Law Review, 1992
- European sectionJournal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 1992
- The Future of the ‘Social Dimension’: Labour Market Regulation in Post 4992 Europe*JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 1992
- 1992 and the working environmentJournal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 1992
- The Implementation of the Community Charter of Fundamental Social RightsThe Modern Law Review, 1990
- How Flexible Is Community Law? An Unusual Approach to the Concept of "Two Speeds"Michigan Law Review, 1984
- Legal Problems Related to a Proposed “Two-Tier System” of Integration within the European CommunityCommon Market Law Review, 1981